Test What Changes Your Retirement Odds.

Retirement Lab is a fast experiment lab for US retirement tradeoffs. Start with a US baseline, change one assumption at a time, and watch the simulated outcome move across 10,000 Monte Carlo paths with US federal and state tax modeling baked in.

Run a US scenario

Example experiment — the simulation shows how the same baseline plays out at three retirement ages:

  • Retire at 58: ~71% simulated success across 10,000 paths.
  • Retire at 62: ~84% simulated success across 10,000 paths.
  • Retire at 65: ~92% simulated success across 10,000 paths.

Numbers are illustrative. The simulation shows what happens when only the retirement age changes.

What to test

Search visitors usually arrive with one concrete US retirement question. These are the experiment lanes the page is built around — each maps to an input you can change in the simulator, not to a feature that promises an answer.

  • Retirement age. Test 55, 58, 60, 62, or 65 against the same spending plan and watch how the simulated success rate moves.
  • Annual spending. Compare $80K, $100K, and $120K plans side by side and see how the simulated balance fan widens or narrows.
  • State tax residency. Compare California, Texas, Florida, Washington, and Colorado as residency assumptions and inspect how state-tax rules ripple through after-tax cash flow.
  • Roth conversions. Model Roth conversion amounts and conversion-window timing as scenario inputs, then read the year-by-year tax detail to see how brackets shift.
  • Social Security claim age. Treat claim age (62, 67, or 70) as a scenario assumption and compare how each shifts the simulated outcome under the same market draws.
  • ACA, Medicare, and IRMAA exposure. Inspect early-retirement years where MAGI assumptions interact with ACA subsidy phaseouts and Medicare IRMAA brackets in the simulated cash flow.
  • Portfolio risk. Compare conservative, balanced, and aggressive return assumptions to see how risk reshapes the percentile fan and the simulated success rate.

Free vs Pro for US planning

The free tier runs the experiment loop end to end. You can build a US baseline, flip a single assumption with Explore a Change, run a single sweep, and put two scenarios side by side in compare mode without an account. Saved scenarios, the year-by-year ledger, and the full US tax detail stay free because they are how you check the simulator’s work.

Pro unlocks the deeper planning loops once a baseline feels trustworthy: full multi-variable sweeps, advanced withdrawal strategies such as guardrails and other adaptive rules, Roth conversion exploration, PDF and CSV exports, and higher-resolution simulations. See pricing for the full breakdown. Either tier stays within the calculator scope: simulated outcomes for the inputs you set, not personalized planning.

How the experiment loop works

  1. Create a US baseline

    Set residency state, ages, current balances, and target spending. The simulator runs 10,000 Monte Carlo paths with US federal and state tax modeling and shows the starting fan chart and simulated success rate. Free, no account required.

  2. Explore one change

    Use Explore a Change to flip a single assumption (age, spending, residency, portfolio risk), or run a sweep across a range of values to see how the simulated outcome bends. Change one lever at a time so you can read the effect cleanly.

  3. Compare the simulated outcome

    Open compare mode to put two scenarios side by side, or drill into the scenario detail ledger for year-by-year cash flow and US tax detail. Inspect what moved instead of trusting one summary number.

Frequently asked questions

Is this a US-only retirement calculator?

The page is built for US planning workflows — US federal tax modeling, state-tax residency, Social Security claim age as a scenario input, and ACA / Medicare / IRMAA-sensitive years are first-class concerns. The same simulator also covers a wider set of residency countries if you want to model an international move; the methodology page documents the country coverage and the assumptions behind each tax module.

How accurate is the US tax modeling?

Each simulated year applies bracket-based US federal income tax to taxable withdrawals, capital-gains tax to realized gains, and the state-tax rules for the residency state you choose. The after-tax cash you can spend in a given year reflects the bracket the simulated portfolio puts you in that year, the way real US taxes work — not a flat haircut. US tax modeling is intentionally simplified: published bracket schedules and standard deductions, not every edge case (AMT, NIIT thresholds, every state-specific surtax). Treat results as a directional simulation, not a tax return.

Can I model Social Security, Roth conversions, or ACA cliffs?

Yes — as scenario inputs you control, not as automated optimization. You can pick a Social Security claim age, set Roth conversion amounts and timing, and read the year-by-year ledger to see how MAGI moves and where ACA subsidy phaseouts or Medicare IRMAA brackets bite. The simulator shows the simulated outcome of those choices; it does not pick a specific strategy for you.

How is this different from the FIRE and Monte Carlo pages?

The FIRE calculator applies the same simulator to financial-independence targeting, and the Monte Carlo retirement simulator page goes deeper on the simulation method (fat-tail-aware returns, percentile bands, sequence risk). This page is the US planning entry point: same engine, framed around the experiment loop a US visitor arrives with — “what changes my retirement odds?”